• Login
    View Item 
    •   AEIPRO
    • Proceedings from the International Congress on Project Management and Engineering
    • CIDIP 2010 (Madrid)
    • View Item
    •   AEIPRO
    • Proceedings from the International Congress on Project Management and Engineering
    • CIDIP 2010 (Madrid)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A COMPARISON OF COMPETENCES REQUIRED IN REVERSE ENGINEERING EXERCISES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ENGINEERING EXERCISES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO IPMA’S COMPETENCE BASELINE

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    CIIP10_2449_2460.PDF (69.42Kb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Calderón, Marco
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The International Project Management Association (IPMA) through its IPMA – ICB Competence Baseline Version 3.0 provides the official definition of the competences expected from project management practitioners and describes the competence elements necessary to develop and realize good project plans and results. In this document, professional project management is broken down into 46 competence elements that cover three ranges: Technical competences for project management; Behavioral competences of project personnel and Contextual competences of projects. As these competences are expected from project management practitioners, it is important to discover how students from related fields start acquiring and developing these competence elements; for example through D/A/A activities (Disassemble, Analysis, Assembly ) also known as Reverse Engineering activities which provide useful ‘hands-on’ learning experiences and are used as a complement to conventional engineering design exercises in an educational context and require the use of several of the competences mentioned in the baseline document. A methodological comparison of the activities involved during a forward engineering exercise versus a reverse engineering exercise is presented, expecting to understand the links between the competences exercised at an educational stage and those expected later during the project engineering practice and how to reflect these findings in improved educational curricula. Keywords: engineering design education; competences; reverse engineering
    URI
    http://dspace.aeipro.com/xmlui/handle/123456789/2159
    Collections
    • CIDIP 2010 (Madrid) [239]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  AEIPRO
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of AEIPROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  AEIPRO
    Contact Us | Send Feedback