DECISION EN GRUPO PARA LA PONDERACIÓN DE LOS CRITERIOS DE EVALUACIÓN, EN EL PROGRAMA DE EVALUACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL (PEI) PARA LAS TITULACIONES EN EL ÁMBITO DE LA INGENIERÍA INDUSTRIAL

Abstract

To determine the weights of the evaluation criteria for Industrial Engineering qualifications, information from the assessors (experts) has first been compiled by means of surveys based on Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). Once the problem has been identified as a group decision process we have considered the importance of the experts as being homogenous, that is to say, that all the experts are equally important. This work focuses on the study of the moment in which the utilities/ preferences of the experts are aggregated. To do this, we have differentiated between the primary and secondary processes. In the primary processes the aggregation is carried out with the judgments of the experts thus creating a single decision problem in which the experts’ evaluations have been synthesized. In the secondary decision, the problem is resolved for each of the experts and then the individual results are aggregated. Keywords: Qualification evaluation, group decision, aggregation methods, Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)